Enforcing a foreign arbitration award in Turkey is not an automatic process. Even if the parties have resolved their dispute through arbitration abroad, the arbitral award must still be reviewed and approved by Turkish courts before it can be executed within Turkey. This is a requirement stemming from the principle of national sovereignty and ensures that any arbitral decision brought into Turkey complies with public order, due process, and Turkish procedural law. Without judicial review, potential violations of rights and inconsistencies with domestic legal standards could arise. Therefore, filing a lawsuit for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Turkey is a mandatory step to give the award binding effect under Turkish law.

For investors, companies, and individuals seeking to enforce an arbitral award in Turkey, understanding this process is essential. The Turkish legal framework sets out detailed conditions and procedures for enforcement, primarily under the Law on Private International and Procedural Law (Law No. 5718) and the 1958 New York Convention to which Turkey is a party. These regulations determine when a foreign award can be recognized, what documents are required, and which courts have jurisdiction. In the following sections, this article explains the legal basis, enforcement requirements, and procedural steps in detail, providing practical guidance for those seeking assistance with the enforcement of arbitration awards in Turkey.

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey are primarily regulated by two main legal sources: the Law on Private International and Procedural Law (Law No. 5718) and the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. These two instruments form the cornerstone of Turkey’s arbitration enforcement regime, ensuring that foreign arbitral awards can be recognized and executed within Turkish jurisdiction under clear and internationally accepted standards.

Turkey became a party to the New York Convention in 1992, thereby undertaking the obligation to recognize and enforce arbitral awards rendered in other contracting states, provided the principle of reciprocity applies. The Convention harmonizes enforcement procedures across member states and limits the grounds on which national courts may refuse recognition. Meanwhile, Law No. 5718 complements the Convention by detailing the domestic procedural rules to be followed before Turkish courts, such as jurisdiction, documentation, and filing requirements. Together, these instruments provide a comprehensive legal foundation that enables foreign investors and international companies to enforce arbitration awards in Turkey with predictability and legal certainty.

You may be interested in: How to Check Registered Companies in Turkey?

Conditions for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Turkey

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey are subject to several substantive and procedural conditions derived from both the Law on Private International and Procedural Law (Law No. 5718) and the 1958 New York Convention. These conditions are designed to ensure that any arbitral award enforced in Turkey complies with the country’s legal principles, public order, and reciprocity rules. Turkish courts will examine each application in light of these two sources before granting enforcement, making it essential for applicants to understand both frameworks clearly.

Conditions in the 1958 New York Convention

Under the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Turkey has made two key declarations. First, it applies the Convention only to arbitral awards rendered in countries that are also parties to the Convention, based on the principle of reciprocity. Second, Turkey enforces the Convention only in disputes considered “commercial” under its domestic law, whether they arise from contractual or non-contractual relationships. These reservations align with Article I(3) of the New York Convention and ensure that foreign arbitral awards in commercial disputes can be recognized and enforced within Turkey while maintaining harmony with national legal policies.

1) Principle of Reciprocity

Under the principle of reciprocity, Turkey enforces foreign arbitral awards only if they are rendered in a country that is also a party to the 1958 New York Convention. This principle ensures that enforcement rights are granted on a mutual basis — Turkish arbitral awards must also be enforceable in the applicant’s country. As a result, if an arbitration award originates from a jurisdiction that is not a member of the New York Convention, it cannot be recognized or enforced by Turkish courts under the Convention framework.

However, Turkey may still allow enforcement through bilateral treaties on mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments and arbitral awards. If a bilateral agreement exists between Turkey and the state where the award was rendered, enforcement may proceed under the terms of that treaty. In contrast, if there is no reciprocity or bilateral agreement, foreign parties will not be able to seek enforcement of their arbitral awards in Turkey. Therefore, before initiating proceedings, it is crucial to verify whether a reciprocal legal relationship or bilateral enforcement treaty exists between Turkey and the issuing country.

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey are only possible when the underlying dispute arises from a legal relationship between the parties. This means that arbitral awards concerning criminal law, administrative law, or other matters that do not stem from a private legal relationship cannot be enforced under Turkish law. In line with Article I(3) of the 1958 New York Convention, each contracting state may limit the scope of enforcement based on the subject matter of disputes. Accordingly, Turkey has exercised this option by restricting the enforcement of arbitral awards to those arising from legal relationships recognized under its domestic legal system. This ensures that only disputes involving private rights and obligations, rather than public or penal matters, fall within the scope of enforceable arbitration awards in Turkey.

You may be interested in: Debt Collection in Turkey

3) Applicability to Commercial Disputes

To enforce an arbitral award in Turkey, the dispute must also be of a commercial nature. The determination of whether a matter is “commercial” is made in accordance with the Turkish Commercial Code, which defines commercial transactions as those connected to trade, business operations, and acts related to commercial enterprises. Accordingly, disputes arising from trade contracts, commercial obligations, partnerships, supply agreements, and similar transactions are considered commercial for both parties, even if only one party qualifies as a trader. Arbitral awards issued on such commercial matters may therefore be recognized and enforced in Turkey. Conversely, disputes of a non-commercial nature — such as those relating to family law, inheritance, or purely personal matters — cannot be subject to recognition and enforcement under Turkish law.

4) Other Conditions

Under the 1958 New York Convention, every contracting state is required to recognize the validity of foreign arbitral awards and decide on their enforcement in accordance with its domestic procedural rules. The Convention prevents member states from imposing stricter conditions or higher fees for the enforcement of foreign awards than those applied to domestic arbitration awards. In line with this obligation, Turkey has harmonized its legislation with the Convention and does not impose additional burdens on applicants, except for the requirement that all documents be submitted with certified Turkish translations. This includes a notarized translation of both the arbitral award and the underlying arbitration agreement or contract between the parties.

In addition, the New York Convention allows for the application of more favorable provisions contained in a state’s domestic law or bilateral treaties. Therefore, if a bilateral agreement between Turkey and another country provides for easier or faster recognition and enforcement than the Convention, those bilateral provisions take precedence. This means that applicants may benefit from simplified procedures or reduced documentation requirements, depending on the relevant treaty. For this reason, it is advisable to conduct legal research on existing bilateral enforcement agreements before filing an application in Turkey to ensure that the most advantageous legal route is followed.

Conditions in the Law on Private International Law and Procedure

According to Article 60 of the Law on Private International and Procedural Law (Law No. 5718), foreign arbitral awards that have become final, binding, and enforceable may be recognized and enforced in Turkey. This provision reflects the fundamental principle that only awards which have attained finality and enforceability under the applicable arbitration rules can be executed through Turkish courts. Awards that are still subject to appeal or have not yet become binding cannot be recognized or enforced, as doing so would contradict the procedural safeguards of Turkish law and the New York Convention.

1) Finality of the Arbitral Award

For the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey, the arbitral award must be final. Finality is determined according to the arbitration rules agreed upon by the parties. If the chosen arbitration rules provide for an appellate or review mechanism, enforcement cannot be sought until that process is completed. Applications made before the award becomes final will be rejected by Turkish courts on procedural grounds. This ensures that enforcement is only granted to decisions that are conclusive and no longer open to challenge in the country where they were rendered.

2) Enforceability of the Arbitral Award

In addition to finality, an arbitral award must be enforceable under the governing law. This means the award must carry binding effect on the parties and be eligible for execution according to the procedural system of the seat of arbitration. Non-binding or suspended awards cannot be recognized in Turkey. Attempting to enforce such an award prematurely could lead to procedural rejection or unnecessary delays. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that the arbitral award has achieved full enforceability before filing a recognition and enforcement lawsuit in Turkish courts.

3) Absence of Grounds for Refusal

Even if the conditions of finality and enforceability are met, Turkish courts will examine the file for potential grounds of refusal. If any of these grounds exist, the court may reject or partially enforce the award. These grounds largely mirror those listed in Article V of the New York Convention and Article 62 of Law No. 5718, and include the following:

  • Absence of a valid arbitration agreement or clause.
  • The award is contrary to Turkish public order or morality.
  • The subject matter is not arbitrable under Turkish law.
  • One of the parties was not properly represented during arbitration and did not later accept the proceedings.
  • The respondent was not duly notified of the appointment of arbitrators or was deprived of the opportunity to present its case.
  • The arbitration clause is void under the governing law or, in its absence, under the law of the country where the award was rendered.
  • The procedure or appointment of arbitrators violated the parties’ agreement or, lacking such agreement, the law of the seat of arbitration.
  • The award deals with issues beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement or exceeds its limits.
  • The award is not final, binding, or enforceable in its home jurisdiction or has been annulled by the competent authority.

If any of these circumstances apply, the Turkish court may refuse enforcement. However, when properly documented and compliant with both the New York Convention and Law No. 5718, foreign arbitral awards are generally enforced without difficulty in Turkey.

How to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Awards in Turkey

The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey covers both awards rendered by ad hoc arbitrators chosen by the parties and those issued by institutional arbitration centers such as the ICC or LCIA. Regardless of the institution or seat of arbitration, the enforcement procedure must be carried out before Turkish courts in accordance with Law No. 5718 on Private International and Procedural Law.

To initiate enforcement, the applicant must file a lawsuit for recognition and enforcement before the competent Turkish court and submit the required documents. These typically include:

  • The arbitration agreement or the contract containing the arbitration clause,
  • A certified copy of the arbitral award,
  • Proof that the award has become final and enforceable, and
  • Certified Turkish translations of all documents.

The submission of originals is not mandatory — notarized copies are sufficient. The finality of the arbitral award is determined based on the arbitration rules agreed by the parties. If those rules include an appellate or review mechanism, enforcement can only be sought after that process is completed. Turkish courts strictly require that all petitions and supporting documents be submitted in Turkish; therefore, parties must obtain legal translations notarized by a Turkish notary public.

Once the court reviews the application, it may grant full or partial enforcement or reject the request. If recognition and enforcement are approved, the foreign arbitral award becomes enforceable in Turkey as if it were a domestic court judgment, meaning it can be executed through Turkish enforcement offices. Decisions on enforcement can also be appealed before the higher courts, following the same procedure applicable to domestic judgments.

Recognition follows the same procedural framework as enforcement — there are no separate legal rules. Thus, all documents and procedural requirements apply equally to both recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey.

For more information on enforcing foreign court judgments, see our related article: How to Enforce Foreign Judgments in Turkey?

Competent Court for the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Turkey

Applications for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey must be filed through a petition before the competent Civil Court of First Instance. If the parties have specified a competent court in their arbitration agreement, that court will have jurisdiction. In the absence of such agreement, the competent court is determined according to the debtor’s place of residence; if the debtor has no residence in Turkey, jurisdiction lies with the court where the assets subject to enforcement are located.

Because court practice and procedural formalities may vary by jurisdiction, it is highly advisable to work with an experienced arbitration enforcement lawyer in Turkey. An experienced lawyer ensures that the petition, supporting documents, and translations meet all formal requirements under Law No. 5718 and the New York Convention, preventing delays or rejections during the enforcement process.

Timeframe and Cost of Enforcement in Turkey

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey generally takes around twelve months, depending on the court’s workload, the complexity of the case, and the debtor’s objections. Cases where the documentation is complete, translations are accurate, and procedural formalities are properly followed tend to progress much faster. If the debtor raises objections or appeals the enforcement decision, the process may extend further until the higher court issues its final judgment.

Regarding the cost of enforcement, Turkey traditionally applied a fixed court fee to such proceedings, based on the reasoning that enforcement actions do not resolve the substance of the dispute but merely confirm the foreign award’s enforceability. However, this practice was revisited by the Turkish Constitutional Court in a landmark 2025 decision, which examined the issue through the lens of constitutional rights—specifically, the right to property and the right of access to justice. The Court concluded that using proportionate fees (calculated as a percentage of the award’s value) does not violate these rights and is compatible with the Turkish Constitution.

As a result, applicants should anticipate that proportionate court fees may now apply in enforcement cases, in addition to costs for translations, notarization, and representation. Working with an experienced arbitration enforcement lawyer in Turkey ensures accurate filing, procedural compliance, and efficient handling of these costs throughout the process.

Common Challenges and Practical Tips

While Turkey provides a clear and reliable legal framework for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, applicants frequently face procedural or practical challenges that may delay or even prevent enforcement. Most issues arise not from the substance of the arbitral award itself, but from technical non-compliance with Turkish procedural requirements.

The most common challenges include:

  • Submitting incomplete or uncertified translations of the arbitration award and agreement.
  • Filing the lawsuit before the award becomes final and enforceable under the applicable arbitration rules.
  • Failing to prove reciprocity between Turkey and the country where the award was rendered.
  • Not properly serving notices or documents on the opposing party according to Turkish procedural law.
  • Attempting to enforce awards that contradict Turkish public order or fall outside the scope of arbitrable matters.

To avoid these pitfalls, it is crucial to:

  • Work closely with a qualified arbitration enforcement lawyer in Turkey to verify jurisdiction and procedural compliance before filing;
  • Ensure all documents, translations, and certifications are prepared in accordance with Law No. 5718 and the New York Convention;
  • Confirm that the award has attained final and binding status;
  • Maintain accurate and traceable records of all procedural notifications and filings.

By following these best practices, applicants can significantly improve their chances of securing timely and successful enforcement in Turkey, while minimizing the risk of procedural rejections or delays.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does the enforcement process take in Turkey?
The timeframe for enforcement varies depending on the court’s workload and the debtor’s objections. On average, proceedings take around twelve months. Well-prepared filings with accurate translations and complete documentation tend to move faster, while appeals may extend the process.
How do you enforce arbitration award in Turkey?
To enforce an arbitration award in Turkey, the party must apply to the competent court with the required documents. After a review by the court, the judge will decide if it can be enforced or not. If positive, you can enforce the award in Turkey, as it was rendered by Turkish courts.
What are the main reasons Turkish courts may refuse enforcement of a foreign arbitral award?
Enforcement may be refused if the arbitration agreement is invalid, if one of the parties was not duly notified, if the award violates Turkish public order, or if it is not final and binding in the country where it was rendered. Other grounds include the absence of reciprocity or procedural defects under Law No. 5718.
How do I enforce my Icsid award in Turkey?
Although ICSID awards are binding under Article 54(1) of the ICSID Convention and treated like final court judgments, they cannot be enforced directly through the enforcement office. According to Article 54(2), the award holder must first apply to the competent court designated by Turkey—the commercial court of first instance (or, where unavailable, the civil court of first instance) located at the place agreed by the parties, or otherwise at the debtor’s domicile or the location of its assets. After this formal confirmation, the ICSID award can be executed in Turkey as a domestic judgment.
Do I need a Turkish lawyer to enforce a foreign arbitral award?
Yes. Only lawyers licensed to practice in Turkey are authorized to represent clients before Turkish courts and enforcement offices. A qualified Turkish law firm ensures compliance with procedural requirements and prevents costly delays or rejections during the recognition and enforcement process.

CONCLUSION

The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Turkey are governed primarily by the 1958 New York Convention and the Law on Private International and Procedural Law (Law No. 5718). These legal instruments together ensure that arbitral awards rendered abroad can have binding effect within Turkey, provided that the necessary procedural and substantive conditions are met. In addition, bilateral treaties between Turkey and other states may offer more favorable terms or simplified procedures, making it essential to assess all applicable legal sources before filing an enforcement action.

Given the technical nature of the process — from verifying reciprocity and preparing certified translations to filing before the competent court — professional legal assistance is indispensable. Only lawyers licensed in Turkey are authorized to represent clients before local courts and enforcement offices. Working with an experienced Turkish law firm or a qualified arbitration enforcement lawyer in Turkey ensures that your petition is properly filed, all documents meet formal requirements, and the proceedings progress efficiently without procedural setbacks.

At Paldımoğlu Law Firm, we assist foreign investors, corporations, and individuals in successfully enforcing arbitral awards under Turkish law. Our team provides end-to-end legal support — from document preparation to execution — ensuring a smooth, compliant, and timely outcome. If you are seeking to enforce a foreign arbitration award in Turkey, our firm offers the experience and precision needed to turn your award into an enforceable judgment.

For any questions or legal assistance regarding this matter, you may contact us at info@paldimoglu.av.tr.

Comment